|
BEFORE YOU FILE AN ETHICS COMPLAINT
Background
The South Metro Denver REALTOR® Association (SMDRA) is
responsible for enforcing the REALTORS® Code of Ethics. The Code
of Ethics imposes duties above and in addition to those imposed by law or
regulation which apply only to real estate professionals who choose
to become REALTORS®.
Many difficulties between real estate professionals (whether REALTORS®
or not) result from misunderstanding, miscommunication, or lack of adequate
communication. If you have a problem with a real estate professional, you
may want to speak with them or with a principal broker in the firm. Open,
constructive discussion often resolves questions or differences, eliminating
the need for further action.
If, after discussing matters with your real estate professional or a
principal broker in that firm, you are still not satisfied, you may want to
contact the South Metro Denver REALTOR® Association.
If, after taking these steps, you still feel you have a grievance, you many
want to consider filing an ethics complaint. You will want to keep in mind
that . . .
-
Only REALTORS®
are subject to the Code of Ethics of the National Association of
REALTORS®.
-
If the real estate
professional (or their broker) you are dealing with is not a REALTOR®,
your only recourse may be the state real estate licensing authority or
the courts.
-
Boards and associations
of REALTORS® determine whether the Code of Ethics has been
violated, not whether the law or real estate regulations have
been broken. Those decisions can only be made by the licensing
authorities or the courts.
-
Boards of REALTORS®
can discipline REALTORS® for violating the Code of Ethics.
Typical forms of discipline include attendance at courses and seminars
designed to increase REALTORS®' understanding of the ethical
duties or other responsibilities of real estate professionals. REALTORS®
may also be reprimanded, fined, or their membership can be suspended or
terminated for serious or repeated violations. Boards and associations
of REALTORS® cannot require REALTORS® to pay money
to parties filing ethics complaints; cannot award "punitive damages" for
violations of the Code of Ethics; and cannot suspend or revoke a real
estate professional's license.
-
The primary emphasis of
discipline for ethical lapses is educational, to create a heightened
awareness of and appreciation for the duties the Code imposes. At the
same time, more severe forms of discipline, including fines and
suspension and termination of membership may be imposed for serious or
repeated violations.
Filing an ethics complaint
return
to top of page>
The South Metro Denver REALTOR®
Association can provide you with information on the procedures for filing an
ethics complaint. Here are some general principles to keep in mind.
-
Ethics complaints must
be filed with SMDRA within one hundred eighty (180) days from the time a
complainant knew (or reasonably should have known) that potentially
unethical conduct took place.
-
The REALTORS®
Code of Ethics consists of seventeen (17) Articles. The duties imposed
by many of the Articles are explained and illustrated through
accompanying Standards of Practice or case interpretations.
-
Your complaint should
include a typed, narrative description of the circumstances that lead
you to believe the Code of Ethics may have been violated.
-
Your complaint must
cite one or more of the Articles of the Code of Ethics which may have
been violated. Hearing panels decide whether the Articles expressly
cited in complaints were violated - not whether Standards of Practice or
case interpretations were violated.
-
The South Metro Denver
REALTOR® Association’s Grievance Committee may provide
technical assistance in preparing a complaint in proper form and with
proper content.
Before the hearing
return to top
of page>
-
Your complaint will be
reviewed by the South Metro Denver REALTOR® Association’s
Grievance Committee. Their job is to review complaints to determine if
the allegations made, if taken as true, might support a violation of the
Article(s) cited in the complaint.
-
If the Grievance
Committee dismisses your complaint, it does not mean they don't believe
you. Rather, it means that they do not feel that your allegations would
support a hearing panel's conclusion that the Article(s) cited in your
complaint had been violated. You may want to review your complaint to
see if you cited an Article appropriate to your allegations.
-
If the Grievance
Committee forwards your complaint for hearing, that does not mean they
have decided the Code of Ethics has been violated. Rather, it means they
feel that if what you allege in your complaint is found to have occurred
by the hearing panel, that panel may have reason to find that a
violation of the Code of Ethics occurred.
-
If your complaint is
dismissed as not requiring a hearing, you can appeal that dismissal to
the board of directors of the South Metro Denver REALTOR®
Association.
-
Familiarize yourself
with the hearing procedures that will be followed. In particular you
will want to know about challenging potential panel members, your right
to counsel, calling witnesses, and the burdens and standards of proof
that apply.
-
Complainants
have the ultimate responsibility ("burden") of proving that the Code of
Ethics has been violated. The standard of
proof that must be met is "clear, strong and convincing"
defined as ". . . that measure or degree of proof which will produce a
firm belief or conviction as to the allegations sought to be
established"" Consistent with American jurisprudence, respondents are
considered innocent unless proven to have violated the Code of Ethics.
-
Be sure that your
witnesses and counsel will be available on the day of the hearing.
Continuances are a privilege - not a right.
-
Be sure you have all
the documents and other evidence you need to present your case.
-
Organize your
presentation in advance. Know what you are going to say and be prepared
to demonstrate what happened and how you believe the Code of Ethics
was violated.
At
the hearing
return to top of page>
-
Appreciate that panel
members are unpaid volunteers giving their time as an act of public
service. Their objective is to be fair, unbiased, and impartial; to
determine, based on the evidence and testimony presented to them, what
actually occurred; and then to determine whether the facts as they find
them support a finding that the Article(s) charged have been violated.
-
Hearing panels cannot
conclude that an Article of the Code has been violated unless that
Article(s) is specifically cited in the complaint.
-
Keep your presentation
concise, factual, and to the point. Your task is to demonstrate what
happened (or what should have happened but didn't), and how the facts
support a violation of the Article(s) charged in the complaint.
-
Hearing panels base
their decisions on the evidence and testimony presented during the
hearing. If you have information relevant to the issue(s) under
consideration, be sure to bring it up during your presentation.
-
Recognize that
different people can witness the same event and have differing
recollections about what they saw. The fact that a respondent or their
witness recalls things differently doesn't mean they aren't telling the
truth as they recall events. It is up to the hearing panel, in the
findings of fact that will be part of their decision, to determine what
actually happened.
-
The hearing panel will
pay careful attention to what you say and how you say it. An implausible
account doesn't become more believable through repetition or, through
volume.
-
You are involved in an
adversarial process that is, to some degree, unavoidably
confrontational. Many violations of the Code of Ethics result from
misunderstanding or lack of awareness of ethical duties by otherwise
well-meaning, responsible real estate professionals. An ethics complaint
has potential to be viewed as an attack on a respondent's integrity and
professionalism. For the enforcement process to function properly, it is
imperative for all parties, witnesses, and panel members to maintain
appropriate decorum.
After the hearing
return to top
of page>
-
When you receive the
hearing panel's decision, review it carefully.
-
Findings of fact are
the conclusions of impartial panel members based on their reasoned
assessment of all of the evidence and testimony presented during the
hearing. Findings of fact are not appealable.
-
If you believe the
hearing process was seriously flawed to the extent you were denied a
full and fair hearing, there are appellate procedures that can be
involved. The fact that a hearing panel found no violation is not
appealable.
-
Refer to the procedures used by the South
Metro Denver REALTOR® Association for detailed information on
the bases and time limits for appealing decisions or requesting a
rehearing. Rehearings are generally granted only when newly discovered
evidence comes to light
(a) which could not reasonably have
been discovered and produced at the original hearing and
(b) which might have had a bearing on
the hearing panel's decision.
Appeals brought by ethics respondents must
be based on
(a) a perceived misapplication or misinterpretation of one or more
Articles of the Code of Ethics,
(b) a procedural deficiency or
failure of due process, or
(c) the nature or gravity of the
discipline proposed by the hearing panel.
Appeals brought by ethics complainants are limited to procedural
deficiencies or failures of due process that may have prevented a full
and fair hearing.
Conclusion
return to top of page>
Many ethics complaints result from
misunderstanding or a failure in communication. Before filing an ethics
complaint, make reasonable efforts to communicate with your real estate
professional or a principal broker in the firm. If these efforts are not
fruitful, the South Metro Denver REALTOR® Association can give
you the procedures and forms necessary to file an ethics complaint. |